SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 2159

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
Siri Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant(s):Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s): None.

JUDGMENT

Rakesh Kumar Jain J. (Oral):-The defendants are in Second Appeal against judgment and decree of both the Courts below whereby the suit of the plaintiff for possession has been decreed.

2. The plaintiff has filed the suit for possession alleging that an agricultural land measuring 17 kanals 18 marlas comprised in Khewat No.202 min Khatoni No.374 Khasra No.106//20/1 (1-0), 118//6(6-18), 140//25/1(2-0) and 142//5(8-0) situated in village Badesra, Tehsil and District Bhiwani was allotted to him by the State of Haryana against the sale consideration of Rs.9508/-. It is alleged that he has deposited the whole price of the land in question and a certificate of allotment has been issued in his favour by the allotment authority. On the strength of the letter of allotment, Mutation No.2705 has already been sanctioned by the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Bhiwani exercising the powers of the prescribed authority on 10.4.1995

3. On notice, defendants appeared and contested the suit. It is alleged by the defendants that suit land is the Harijan Colony and they are in possession since long as owners by virtue of purchase of the suit land from one big land owner named Ganeshi s/o Udey Ra

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top