SABINA
Surinder Pal Singh Chhina – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Sabina, J.:- This order shall dispose of CRM-M No. 48058 of 2002 and CRM-M No. 25093 of 2003.
2. I have heard the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned State counsel.
3. The meaningful question involved in these cases is as to whether the petitioner is a public servant.
4. A ‘public servant’ as defined in Sub-clauses (iii), (viii) and (ix) of Clause (c ) of Section 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (‘the Act’ for short) reads as follows:-
“2. Definition- In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) xx xx xx
(b) xx xx xx
(c) ‘public servant” means,-
(iii) any person in the service or pay of a corporation established by or under a Central, Provincial or State Act, or an authority or a body owned or controlled or aided by the Government or a Government company as defined in Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956;
(viii) any person who holds an office by virtue of which he is authorised or required to perform any public duty;
(ix)any person who is the President, Secretary or other office bearer of a registered cooperative society, engaged in agriculture, industry, trade or banking, receiving or having received any financial a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.