SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 923

K.SHARMA
Gulzar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Julphan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Vinod K. Sharma, J. (Oral).:- This judgment shall dispose of RSA Nos. 972 & 973 of 2007 titled Gulzar Singh Versus Julphan & others, as both these appeals arise out of the same judgment and decree.

2. For the sake of brevity, facts are being taken from RSA No. 972 of 2007.

3. The plaintiff/appellant brought a suit claiming possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 24.5.1993 and 17.6.1993, said to have been executed by guardian of Julphan minor.

4. It was pleaded, that by way of agreement dated 24.5.1993 the minor defendant / respondent Nos.1 and 2 had agreed to sell land measuring 5K-3M. However, in spite of permission by the Court defendant failed to execute the conveyance deed. It was also pleaded that the plaintiff was willing and still willing to perform his part of contract.

5. The suit was filed on 20.7.1994. Respondents No.1and 2, i.e. minor filed another suit on 30.7.1994, to challenge the agreement dated 24.5.1993 to be null and void and not binding on the rights of the plaintiff / respondents No.1 and 2.

6. The suit was contested, primarily on the plea, that the agreement dated 24.5.1993 was not enforceable, in law as respondent No.1 an































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top