SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1665

2009(4) LAW HERALD (P&H) 2614
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vinod K. Sharma
FAO No.158-M of 2003
Dr.Ashok Kumar Aggarwal
v.
Smt.Anju Raje
{Decided on 23/09/2009}

Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ravinder Rana. Advocate.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, S.13--Divorce--Adultery--It was incumbent upon husband to have impleaded alleged adulterer party in absence whereof plea of adultery cannot be accepted. (P.12)

       (B) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, S.13--Divorce--Cruelty--Adultery--Wife joined matrimonial home after marriage even without submitting his resignation from govt. job Gorakhpur--Plea of husband that wife kept govt. accommodation to merit her male friends not proved by any cogent evidence--Whereas season for retaining house was that her sister was residing in that house--Husband not entitled to decree of divorce. (P.20)

       (C) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, S.13--Divorce--Adultery--Proof--Mere based on calculation of fertility period of woman suspicion of husband cannot be proof of adultery, especially when husband has seen wife in company of any male member nor he could name anyone.

       

JUDGMENT

Vinod K. Sharma, J.:-This appeal by the husband is directed against the judgment and decree dated 9.4.2003 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh dismissing the petition filed by the appellant under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short the Act) for dissolution of marriage.

2. The appellant sought a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty and adultery on the pleadings that the parties were married on 10.6.1994 at Lucknow according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. After the marriage, the parties lived together and cohabited as husband and wife at Pilani (Rajasthan), Guwahati (Assam) and Chandigarh. No child was born out of this wed-lock. The appellant claimed that he is an intellectual and belonged to cream scientific society of the country. Due to indefinite attitude of the respondent, the appellant could not enjoy his happy married life. The respondent was said to be lethargic type of woman who did not take interest in the household affairs and personal comforts of the appellant. She was said to be having her own male friends in her circle. At the time of marriage she was working as a Post Graduate Teacher in Northern East Railway Senior Secondary School, Gorakhpur. Despite the assurance given to the appellant that she will leave her job as she got another job as Post Graduate Teacher at Birla Balika Vidyapeeth, Pillani, she kept accommodation provided to her for a period of 21 months at Gorakhpur just to meet her male friends periodically. It was on account of persuasion of the appellant that she resigned her job in the month of January, 1995 but she retained Govt. Accommodation till the month of March,1996.

3. In view of the behaviour of the respondent, the appellant left his job at Pilani and joined the institution of Advance Study in Science and Technology as Professor and Head of the Mathematical Science Division at Guwahati. At Pilani the appellant was working as Association Professor in Birla Institute of Technology. He remained in Guwahati from 2.1.1996 to 12.5.1998 and during this period the respondent stayed with the appellant for about half of the time. She was said to be having quarreling habits and continued creating atmosphere for annoyance of the appellant. The appellant joined Punjab University, Chandigarh as Professor of Mathematics on 14.5.1998 and the respondent remained with him at Chandigarh from June, 1998 to 4.11.1998. On 9.11.1998 the respondent left her matrimonial home and started living with her parents at Fatehgarh (UP). During the period the respondent stayed with the appellant he found that the respondent had irregular menstruation period and on medical check up it was discovered that the respondent had tilted uterus which caused blockage of one side of Fallopian tube. All this was to avoid conception. In the month of March, 1995 she conceived but got aborted in the month of May, 1995.

4. It was the case set up by the appellant that when the parties were residing at Guwahati they were advised by the doctor to be careful regarding direct physical sexual contact it being risky as the respondent had some internal infection problem. On account of this, the appellant started using contraceptives at the time of intercourse. On 24.11.1998 the appellant received a telephone call from the respondent stating that she had become pregnant. The appellant asked her the name of the person from whom she conceived pregnancy. It was the case of the appellant that the respondent conceived pregnancy with physical contact with another person from her male friendly circle. The respondent, however, refused to disclose the secret and she got aborted in the month of January, 1999. The respondent was asked by the appellant to keep a piece of flesh of child for DNA test for expert opinion regarding the character of the respondent. It was the case of the appellant that the respondent developed extra marital relations with other persons from her male friendly circle. On 9.3.1999 t








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top