Rajan Gupta J. (Oral).:- This is a revision petition against the order dated 30.05.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track, Ludhiana vide which charge has been framed against the petitioners under Sections 307, 353, 186, 171, 333, 332, 148, 149 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. No offence is made out against them particularly offence under Section 307 IPC and thus, the impugned order dated 30.05.2009 framing charge deserves to be setaside. Learned counsel has placed reliance on the judgment of this Court reported as Gurmit Singh Vs. U.T. Chandigarh, 2003(1) RCR (Crl.) 535 to contend that in the said case this court was pleased to set-aside an order whereby charge under Section 307 IPC was framed, while other charges were allowed to stand. According to the counsel, the instant case is of similar nature.

3. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and perused the record annexed with the petition.

4. The allegations against the petitioners as made out from the impugned charge-sheet are that on 11.05.2008 at about 9.00 P.M. in the area of village Ramgarh Bhulla