SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 275

RAJESH BINDAL
Gurpreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. J.S. Bhuller, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Bindal, J.:- The prayer of the petitioners is for quashing of the order dated 10.7.2007, the criminal complaint No. 105/2 of 2000 dated July 24, 2002 and the summoning order dated July 16, 2005 alongwith all subsequent proceedings or in the alternative for setting aside the order dated July 10, 2007 and for remanding the case back to the court of learned Sessions Judge, Jalandhar for deciding the revision petition filed by the petitioners on merits.

2. The present proceedings arise out of a complaint filed by the appropriate authority-cum-Senior Medical Officer, Incharge Sub Division Hospital, Phillaur filed under Sections 4 (1) (2) (3), 6 and 29 Rule No. 9 (4) (6) and Rule No. 10 of the Pre-Natal diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 (for short “the Act) . Vide order dated July 16, 2005 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Phillaur, petitioners were summoned, prima facie, for violation of Sections 4 (1) (2) (3), 6 and 29 Rule No. 9 (4) (6) and Rule No. 10 of the Rules. Against the order of summoning, petitioners filed revision before the learned Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, who vide order dated July 10, 2007 dismissed t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top