Mahesh Grover, J.:-The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. for quashing of complaint dated 11.9.2003, Annexure P1, filed by respondent-Harmeeta Singh, under the provisions of Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read ­with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘the I.P.C.') and the consequent summoning order dated 31.1.2005 (Annexure P2). They have also made a prayer therein for setting aside order dated 7.10.2006 (Annexure P5) whereby their revision petition filed against the summoning order, Annexure P2, has been dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon.

2. The complaint, even though preferred under Section 66 of the Act, has its genesis in a marital discord, which lurks in the background.

3. The respondent-complainant was married to petitioner no.1-Rajat Taneja on 24.3.2002 and thereafter, both of them lived together in the United States of America.

4. However, the marriage did not work out and the respondent, whose tourist visa was to expire on 27.9.2002, came to India on 24.9.2002. Immediately thereafter, F.I.R.No.311 dated 21.10.2002 was lodged by her agains