SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 410

2008(3) LAW HERALD (P&H) (DB) 2574
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(DIVISION BENCH)
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.S. Garewal
The Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary
CWP No.3976 of 2008
Gram Panchayat Panj Garaian
v.
State of Punjab
{Decided on 14/05/2008}

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. D.P.S. Randhawa, Advocate
For the Respondent No.3:Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. N.S. Virk, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

IMPORTANT POINT
Gram Sabha--There must be physical separation before a Gram Sabha is separated--If Gram Sabhas remain closely attached to each other, division would certainly hamper development.

Headnote:Revenue Law--Constitution of New Gram Sabha--Historical factors--‘Others relevant facts’--It should be constituted by taking into consideration its physical distance from the main village or villages--Historical factors should not be overlooked there must be physical separation before a Gram Sabha is separated--If Gram Sabhas remain closely attached to each other, division would certainly hamper development--Division of a village without any justifiable reason would strike at its very soul--|Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 3--|Constitution of India, 1950, Article 243, 343-A to 243-O.

        (Para 11 & 27)

JUDGMENT

K.S.Garewal, J.:-

“There is no village in India, that does not have a rich or legendary history of its own. Some god or godlike hero has passed by the village—Rama might have rested under this pipal tree, Sita might have dried her clothes, after her bath, on this yellow stone, or the Mahatama himself, on one of his many pilgrimages through the country might have slept in this hut, the low one, by the village gate. In this way the past mingles with the present, and the gods mingle with men...........” (Raja Rao in his introduction to “Kanthapura.”)

2. We have before us a number of petitions (CWP No. 3976 of 2008 Gram Panchayat Panj Garaian Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 4156 of 2008 Jatinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 6156 of 2008 Gram Panchayat of Village Siryewala Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 5692 of 2008 Gram Panchayat Piareana Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 6602 of 2008 Parminder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 4643 of 2008 Tarsem Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 4092 of 2008 Gram Panchayat Village Sabhra Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 4068 of 2008 Gram Panchayat Miaonwal Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 3850 of 2008 Raj Pal Singh Bedi Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 4311 of 2008 Gram Panchayat Sohian Kalan Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 6473 of 2008 Kuldip Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 5975 of 2008 Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 3765 of 2008 Kulwant Bir Singh & Others Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 6461 of 2008 Manjit Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 4106 of 2008 Preet Pal Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others and CWP No. 4069 of 2008 Hira Lal and others Vs. State of Punjab and others) concerning constitution of new Gram Sabhas by separating them from already established Gram Sabhas.

3. Section 3 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 entitles the State Government to declare any village or group of contiguous villages, with a population of not less than two hundred, to constitute a Gram Sabha area. However, this provision also has a proviso that a new Gram Sabha area should be constituted by taking into consideration its physical distance from the main village or villages, as the case may be and other relevant facts.

4. The Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 is a comprehensive enactment which establishes a three-tier Panchayati Raj system in the State of Punjab. The Act provides for elected bodies at the village, Block and District levels, in keeping with the provisions of the Constitution (Seventythird Amendment) Act, 1992. This is to encourage greater participation of the people and more effective implementation of rural development and Panchayati Raj system. The above mentioned constitutional amendment introduced Article Part IX for the Panchayats by enacting Article 243, 243- A to 243-O. Article 243 defines a Gram Sabha to mean a body consisting of persons registered in the electorals rolls relating to a village comprised within the area of the Panchayat which has been defined as an institution of self government constituted under article 243B for rural areas.

5. The Supreme Court of India in State of Punjab Vs. Tehal Singh and others 2002(2) P.L.R. 347 laid down certain principles of law holding that provisions of Sections 3 and 4 of the Act for declaring territortial area of a Gram Sabha did not concern the interest of an individual citizen or a particular resident of that area. The declaration under Section 3 made by the Government was general in character and not directed to a resident of a particular area. A Gram Panchayat was entrusted many general functions and numerous other powers and duties(Section 30 of the Act).

6. The Supreme Court held that making a declaration under Section 3 of the Act determining the terrotortial area of a Gram Sabha and thereafter establishing a Gram Sabha for that area



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top