SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1541

MOHINDER PAL
Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Jaibir – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sat Narain Yadav, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mohinder Pal, J.:- The marriage of petitionr Smt. Suresh with respondent Jaibir was solemnized on 18.6.1991. Earlier to her marriage with Jaibir, the petitioner was married to Sukhbir, who was real uncle of Jaibir and expired on 17.6.1991. Four issues were born out of the wedlock of the petitioner with the respondent. However, the marriage between the parties was not successful. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking divorce from the respondent. The respondent filed reply in that petition and levelled allegations against the character of his wife. He doubted the parentage of the child delivered by the petitioner at her parent's house after her ouster from the matrimonial house. Ultimately, the divorce petition was dismissed. When the respondent refused to keep and maintain the petitioner with him, she moved an application under Sections 12, 18, 19 and 20 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). In support of her application, the petitioner filed an affidavit.

2. In the reply filed by the respondent, he admitted the factum of his marriage with the petitioner and the b








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top