SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 280

K.C.PURI
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Balwinder Singh Patwari – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. A.S. Rai, AAG, Punjab.
For the Respondent:Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. K.C. Puri, J.:- State of Punjab has preferred this petition for leave to appeal as the accused-respondent has been acquitted by the learned Special Judge, Moga vide judgment dated 10.3.2007.

2. The factual matrix of the prosecution case is that on 20.2.2004 Surjit Singh Khosa, DSP Vigilance Bureau, Moga was present in his house where Jagjit Singh along with Mohinder Singh came. Jagjit Singh got recorded his statement that he is running shop of spare parts at Gulabi Bagh, Moga near Punjab and Sind Bank, Moga. His friend Kuldeep Kumar had purchased land measuring 3 marlas 3 saraahies in the area of Bedi Nagar, Moga on 27.11.2003. Complainant has been given Power of Attorney by Kuldeep Kumar to get the mutation sanctioned in his favour after execution of the sale deed. Complainant visited Balwinder Singh, Revneue Patwari of Area Moga Mehal Singh-II and handed over to him photostat copy of the sale deed and requested him to get the mutation entered and sanctioned. Balwinder Singh, Patwari had kept the photostat copy of the sale deed with him and assured complainant that he will done his work soon. After that complainant visited the office of Balwinder Singh, Patwari so many











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top