L.N.MITTAL
Mehnga Singh – Appellant
Versus
Santa Singh – Respondent
Mr. L. N. Mittal, J.: (Oral). - C. M. No. 8609-C of 2010
Deficiency in court fee is said to have been made good. The application is, therefore, allowed.
C. M. No. 8611-C of 2010
2. This is application for impleading legal representatives of plaintiff no.4 Harpal Singh (since deceased). It is alleged that Harpal Singh has left behind widow and a minor son and a minor daughter, as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application, as his legal heirs. The application is accompanied by affidavit. Accordingly, the application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions and persons mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application are ordered to be impleaded as legal representatives of Harpal Singh (since deceased) for the purpose of this appeal and are permitted to file the appeal as such.
Main Appeal:
This is second appeal by plaintiffs no.1 and 2 and legal representatives of plaintiff no.4. Plaintiffs were successful in the trial court but have been non-suited by the lower appellate court.
4. Plaintiffs’ case is that plaintiff no.1 is co-sharer to the extent of 25 kanals 05 marlas and plaintiffs no.2 and 3 are co-sharers to the extent of 18 kanals 18¾ marlas each in joint land measuring
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.