SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 840

L.N.MITTAL
Mehnga Singh – Appellant
Versus
Santa Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mr. G. S. Nagra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. L. N. Mittal, J.: (Oral). - C. M. No. 8609-C of 2010

Deficiency in court fee is said to have been made good. The application is, therefore, allowed.

C. M. No. 8611-C of 2010

2. This is application for impleading legal representatives of plaintiff no.4 Harpal Singh (since deceased). It is alleged that Harpal Singh has left behind widow and a minor son and a minor daughter, as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application, as his legal heirs. The application is accompanied by affidavit. Accordingly, the application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions and persons mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application are ordered to be impleaded as legal representatives of Harpal Singh (since deceased) for the purpose of this appeal and are permitted to file the appeal as such.

Main Appeal:

This is second appeal by plaintiffs no.1 and 2 and legal representatives of plaintiff no.4. Plaintiffs were successful in the trial court but have been non-suited by the lower appellate court.

4. Plaintiffs’ case is that plaintiff no.1 is co-sharer to the extent of 25 kanals 05 marlas and plaintiffs no.2 and 3 are co-sharers to the extent of 18 kanals 18¾ marlas each in joint land measuring





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top