2011(2) Law Herald (P&H) 1665
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mehinder Singh Sullar
Civil Writ Petition No.19224 of 2006
The Hindu Urban Cooperative Bank Limited
v.
The State Information Commission & Ors.
{Decided on 09/05/2011}
(B) Right to Information Act, 2005, S.2(h)--‘Public Authority’--Meaning of--Explained--Held; apart from the authorities established or constituted by the Government depicted in clauses (a) to (c) and any authority, body owned, controlled and non-Government Organization substantially financed by funds provided directly or indirectly by the appropriate government as mentioned in subclauses (i) & (ii) of clause (d) would squarely falls within the ambit of public authority independently as provided under section 2(h) of the Act and are legally required to provide informations to the complainants. (Paras 36, 37 & 38)
(C) Right to Information Act, 2005, S.2(h)--Cooperative Societies comes under the preview of Right to Information Act--Held; All the cooperative Societies registered under the cooperative Societies Acts are public authorities and are bound to act in conformity with the provisions of the RTI Act.
(D) Right to Information Act, 2005, S.2(h)--Punjab Cricket Association, Mohali enjoying tax explanation--RTI Act will apply because PCA is substantially financed directly or indirectly by appropriate Government inform of grants and aids--Also govt. is providing security on every occasion by spending huge amount of payment on police agencies. (Para 68)
(E) Right to Information Act, 2005, S.2(h)--Private Aided Schools--Received financial and from Govt. in form of relation in lease rules in allotment of land and also grant of salaries against sanctioned posts--Comes under preview of RTI Act. (Para 63 & 65)
(F) Right to Information Act, 2005, S.2(h)--Public Authority--Cooperative Societies--The deep and pervasive control as required under Article 12, is not required and essential ingredient for invoking the provisions of RTI Act.
The primary purpose of instrumentality of the State is in relation to enforcement of the fundamental rights through Courts, whereas the RTI Act is intended to achieve, access to information and to provide an effective framework for effecting the right to information recognized under Article 19 of the Constitution.
(G) Right to Information Act, 2005, S.2(h)--Right to information--Meaning of--Right to information accessible under this Act which is held by or under the control of any public authority and includes the right to--(i) inspection of work, documents, records; (ii) taking notes, extracts, or certified copies of documents or records; (iii) taking certified samples of material; and (iv) obtaining information in the form of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts where such information is stored in a computer or in any other device. (Para 29)
(H) Right to Information Act, 2005, S.2(h)--Public Authority--Cooperative Societies, Banks, Sugar Mills, Aided Schools, Clubs and Institutions registered under provision of Punjab/Haryana Cooperative Societies Acts would be Covered under preview of RTI Act.
Held; that, inter-alia, if the epitome of the facts (i) that the petitioner-Institutions cannot come into existence and function unless registered and regulated by the provisions; (ii) the control of the State Government over them, through the medium of the provisions of the indicated Acts/Rules, (iii) substantially financed by the funds provided directly or indirectly by the appropriate Government, (iv) the mandate and command of the provisions of the RTI Act; (v) their public dealing, (vi) preamble, aims, objects and regime of this Act, (vii) the larger public interest--The conclusion is inevitable and inescapable that the petitioner-institutions squarely fall within the ambit and scope of definition of public authorities and are legally required to impart the indicated informations to the complainants as envisaged under the RTI Act. If the contrary arguments--Are accepted, then-- It will nullify the aims and objects of the RTI Act, perpetuating and inculcating the injustice to the larger public interest in general and to the complainants in particular in this context.
(I) Right to Information Act, 2005--Exemption Clause--Held; Only those informations are exempted, the disclosure of which, has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual, unless the authorities are satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information. (Para 87)
Me hinder Singh Sullar , J.:- As strange as it may seem, but strictly speaking, the tendency and frequency, of some of the Institutions, of not supplying and taking somersault in denying the informations, have been tremendously increasing day by day, leaving the public at large in general and the information seekers in particular, in lurch to damage the edifice of the democracy and larger public interest. The matter in hand is a burning example of such like cases.
2. As identical questions of law and facts are involved and collectively argued by learned counsel for the parties, therefore, I propose to dispose of the instant writ petitions, by virtue of this common judgment, in order to avoid the repetition in this regard. Be that as it may, the facts of individual institutions, which need a necessary mention, for deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant writ petitions, would be separately discussed at the appropriate place and stage in the subsequent part of this judgment.
3. The matrix of the facts, culminating in the commencement, relevant for disposal of the present writ petitions and emanating from the record, is that the different information-seekers-private respondent-complainants (for brevity “complainants”) moved their respective applications, in all the cases, to the concerned State Public Information-Officers (in short “SPIOs”) of the petitioner- Cooperative Societies-banks-Sugar Mills-aided schools-Clubs-Institutions (for short “petitioner-Institutions”) and sought the informations depicting therein, invoking the provisions of The Right to Information Act, 2005(hereinafter to be referred as “the RTI Act”). The petitioners-Cooperative Societies, banks & Sugar Mills (at Sr.Nos.1 to 8) are registered and governed by the provisions of The Punjab/Haryana Cooperative Societies Acts (hereinafter to be referred as “the Cooperative Societies Acts”). Similarly, the petitioners-Gita Girls schools (at Sr.No.9) are also subjected to the provisions of The Haryana Education Act, 1995 (hereinafter to be referred as “the Education Act”) and Haryana Aided Schools (Special Pension and Contributory Provident Fund) Rules, 2001 (hereinafter to be referred as “the Rules”). The petitioners-Model School, Saini Education Society, Punjab Cricket Association (for brevity “PCA”), Chandigarh Lawn Tennis Association (in short “CLTA”), Jullundar Gymkhana and Sutlej Club (at Sr.Nos.10 to 15) are regulated by the provisions of The Societies Registration Act, 1860 as well.
4. The complainants claimed that the requisite informations were not supplied to them by the SPIOs of the petitioner-Institutions, mainly on the ground that, since they do not fall within the ambit of public authorities, so, the provisions of the RTI Act are not applicable to them and they are not legally obliged to supply the informations. Dissatisfied with the conduct of the SPIOs, some of the complainants filed the first appeals before the first appellate authority, but in vain and the informations were still not supplied to them by the petitioner-institutions on the same ground.
5. Aggrieved by the actions of the petitioner-Institutions, the complainants filed the second appeals before the State Information Commissions, Punjab & Haryana (in short “SIC”), inter-alia on the ground that as the provisions of the RTI Act are fully applicable, therefore, they were liable to supply the indicated informations to them. The petitioner-Institutions contested the claim of the complainants and reiterated their previous stand of non-application of the provisions of RTI Act to them in this context.
6. Taking into focus the control of the State Governments under the above mentioned Acts and Rules and the direct or indirect funds provided by the appropriate Governments to them, the SIC came to the conclusion that the provisions of RTI Act are applicable to the petitioner-Institutions and they are legally bound to provide the projected informations and accepted the appeals
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.