SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1283

JASWANT SINGH
Neetu Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jaswant Singh J.(Oral) :- Kapil Dev Yadav, husband of the petitioner/claimant died in a motor vehicular accident. She alongwith her minor children filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988. The said claim petition was decided by the Lok Adalat and the petitioner alongwith her minor children were awarded a total compensation of Rs.4,27,000/-, out of which the petitioner was held entitled to a share of Rs.1,77,000/-. Out of her share of Rs.1,77,000/- a sum of Rs.50,000/- was released in favour of the petitioner and the remaining amount of Rs.1,27,000/- was ordered to be deposited in FDR.

2. It is stated that since the petitioner alongwith her minor children are living in a rented accommodation and want to construct a house of their own for which petitioner wanted the remaining amount of Rs.1,27,000/- lying deposited in her name in FDR and accordingly she moved an application before the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,Hisar for release of the said amount. However, the learned MACT, Hisar, vide impugned order dated 15.4.2011 ordered the release of only Rs.27,000/-. Hence the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitutio






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top