SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1174

2011(3) LAW HERALD (P&H) 2052
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
Criminal Appeal No.85-SB of 2003
Boota Singh
v.
State of Punjab
{Decided on 17/05/2011}

Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Amarjit Markan, Advocate.
For the State:Mr. B.S. Sra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Ss.306 & 498-A--Abetment of suicide--Cruelty to Wife--There is no evidence that for non-fulfillment of any demand, the accused said or did anything, which led the deceased to commit suicide--Therefore, the allegation that the accused told the deceased that it would be better if she dies, cannot be taken into consideration--However, giving beating to the wife under the influence of liquor will constitute an offence punishable u/s 498-A IPC--Conviction u/s 306 IPC is set aside--But, convicted u/s 498-A of IPC--Appeal disposed of. (Paras 23, 24)

       (B) Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.306--Abetment of suicide--Proof of--Merely because under the influence of liquor, on something said by the wife the accused used abusive language and gave beating to her, will not be sufficient to hold that the appellant committed an offence punishable u/s 306 IPC. (Para 23)

       (C) Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.498-A--Cruelty to wife--Giving beating to the wife under the influence of liquor will constitute an offence punishable u/s 498-A of IPC. (Para 23)

       (D) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Ss.306 & 498-A--Abetment of suicide--Cruelty to Wife--Witness--Presence of at the place of occurrence--Doubtful--Contention that in the statement made to the police, on the basis of which formal FIR was registered, it was stated by PW4 that at that time the accused had given beating to his wife and used abusing language--In the court the witness stated that the appellant told his wife that it would be better if she dies--At that time also, the witnesses (brother and father of the deceased) did noting and permitted deceased to commit suicide--Their conduct is improbable unnatural and unconvincing--There was no occasion for the witness to arrive at the house of deceased--They had not accompanied her to the hospital--In the ruqa, doctor has specifically mentioned that the deceased was brought to the hospital by her mother-in-law--Presence o f witnesses is not recorded by the doctor at the hospital--High Court find merit regarding the non-presence of complainant PW4 and his father at the spot--Thus, the presence of these two witnesses at the spot is held doubtful. (Paras 18 & 19)

       

JUDGMENT

Mr. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral):- Boota Singh-appellant was named as an accused in a case FIR No. 127 dated 13.04.2001 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sangrur under Section 306 IPC. In the above said FIR, the case was tried by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Sangrur, which vide its judgment dated 19th December, 2002 found the appellant guilty of an offence punishable under Section 306 IPC and vide a separate order of even date sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. Present appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence recorded by the Court below.

2. On 13th April, 2001, a ruqa Ex.PA was sent by the Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, Sangrur to the SHO, Police Station Sangrur. It was stated therein that Gurpreet Kaur wife of Boota Singh, resident of village Uppli has been brought in the hospital by her mother-in-law Dalip Kaur and others, with 90 percent burns. On receipt of the ruqa, ASI Surinder Kumar PW-7 reached at the Police Station, where he received another ruqa that Gurpreet Kaur has died. Thereafter, at the same time, i.e. on 13th April, 2001 at about 1.40 p.m. at the Civil Hospital, Sangrur, he recorded the statement of Darshan Singh PW-4, brother of deceased Gurpreet Kaur. The statement so recorded by ASI Surinder Kumar PW-7 was proved as Ex.PE. Darshan Singh PW-4 stated that he was a resident of village Chhajli and was working as a labourer in a brick kiln at Sunam. His younger sister Gurpreet Kaur was married with Boota Singh son of Kaka Singh alias Ram Singh, caste Majbhi resident of village Uppli. No child was born out of the said wedlock. Boota Singh was employed as a driver of the truck. He was addicted to liquor and used to go to his house every day under the influence of liquor. Sister of the complainant used to restrain her husband-accused Boota Singh from consuming alcohol, due to which there used to be an altercation between both of them. This fact was disclosed by the deceased sister to the complainant many times. On 12th April, 2001, complainant Darshan Singh along with his father Jang Singh had gone to meet Gurpreet Kaur to know her welfare. On that day also, the accused came late at his house after having consumed alcohol. In the presence of complainant and his father, the accused used foul language with his wife. In the next morning, i.e. on 13th April, 2001 the accused again went to the liquor vend and returned after having consumed alcohol. Under the influence of liquor, the accused gave beatings to his wife and also used abusive language. The complainant and his father restrained the accused, but the accused told to his wife that it would be better, if she finish herself. Thereafter, the accused went out while giving abuses. Being fed-up with the accused-husband Boota Singh, Gurpreet Kaur told the complainant that it would be better to die than to live such a life. At that time, it was about 9.30 a.m. The complainant along with his father was sitting inside the room when they felt smell of kerosene oil from outside the courtyard. They also saw the smoke coming out. When both of them came out, they saw that Gurpreet Kaur had caught fire. She was running towards the street while shouting ‘Bachao Bachao’. She was saying that she would finish the daily dispute. Gurpreet Kaur was brought to the Civil Hospital, Sangrur in a tractor-trolley. In the trolley, her mother-in-law Dalip Kaur and other residents of the village also accompanied her. The complainant and his father went to make a telephonic call to village Chhajli. Complainant’s sister Gurpreet Kaur was got admitted in the hospital by her mother-in-law Dalip Kaur.

3. The above said FIR was investigated and a report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was submitted. The case was committed and entrusted to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, S































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top