SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1624

ALOK SINGH
Shamsher Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Alok Singh, J. (Oral): - Petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court assailing the orders dated 16.11.2010, 26.9.2007 and 30.3.2007 passed by respondents No.1, 2 and 3, respectively, arising out of the mutation proceedings.

2. Petitioner is claiming himself natural heir of Mohinder Singh being his son while private respondents are claiming inheritance on the basis of alleged registered ‘Will’.

3. Undisputedly, as on day no land revenue is assessed or is being recovered in the States of Punjab and Haryana.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that civil suit between the parties is already pending involving the question of inheritance of the estate of Mohinder Singh.

5. Privy Council in (Thakur) Nirman Singh and others versus Thakur Lal Rudra Partap Narain Singh and others, A.I.R.1926 Privy Council-100, has held as under:-

“It is an error to suppose that the proceedings for the mutation of names are judicial proceedings in which the title to and the proprietary rights in immovable property are determined. They are nothing of the kind, as has been pointed out times innumerable by the Judicial Committee. They are much more in the nature of fisca




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top