SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1896

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Gurwinder Singh @ Mintu – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.S.Pheruman, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. A.S. Rai, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.: - This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.244 dated 25.09.2007, registered under Sections 399, 401, 402 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short “IPC”] and 25, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, 1959 [for short “the Act”] at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala.

2. The allegations in the FIR are that a secret information was received by the police party that Jagjit Singh @ Billa, Gurcharan Singh, Ranjit Singh @ Kala, Sat Narain, Parmod Kumar and Gurwinder Singh @ Mintu (petitioner herein) have assembled and were preparing for committing dacoity with deadly weapons. A raid was conducted and all the aforesaid persons except the petitioner were apprehended along with their respective weapons. The challan against all the aforesaid persons except the petitioner was presented but Sat Narain and Parmod Kumar were tried in absentia as they were declared proclaimed offenders, for the offence punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC read with Section 25 of the Arms Act. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, vide his order dated 18.04.2011, acquitted Jagjit Singh @ Billa, Gurcharan Singh and Ranjit Singh, after giving them benefit of doubt












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top