SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 168

RAJESH BINDAL
Suman – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicant-appellant:Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. S. P. Chahar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rajesh Bindal, J.: - Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment of the learned court below whereby petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, “the Act”) for divorce, was allowed.

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the marriage of the parties was solemnised as per Hindu rites on 16.3.1994 at Village Jatuwas, Tehsil and District Mahendergarh. After the marriage, the parties resided at their matrimonial home. Out of their wedlock one female child was born. Appellant’s sister Savitri was also married in the same family with Pawan, brother of the respondent-husband. It was alleged by the respondent in his petition for divorce before the court below that after some time of the marriage, the appellant started misbehaving with him and his family members. She left the matrimonial at her own. It was also alleged by the respondent that his brother Pawan died as a result of consumption of excessive liquor in the marriage of his cousin but the appellant wife and his sister Savitri lodged a false case against the respondent, his sister and parents after a period of six months. The respondent tried to bring her
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top