SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 2036

GURDEV SINGH
Partap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Ms. G.K. Mann, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Gurdev Singh, J.: - Heard.

2. This petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by Partap Singh son of Baz Singh, petitioner-accused, for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 75 dated 12.7.2011 registered under Sections 323, 324, 326, 307, 506 read with Sect6ion 34 IPC in Police Station Ghanie-Ke-Bangar, Tehsil Batala, District Gurdaspur. As per the contentions made therein, he has been falsely implicated and there is delay of four days in lodging the FIR. On the basis of the X-ray report, doctor had opined that the injuries, so found on the person of the injured, were simple and subsequently, those have been declared grievous without any such report of the expert. There was no ground for adding offences under Sections 326 and 307 IPC and those have been added just for making the offence non-bailable.

3. This FIR was registered on the statement of Balkar Singh, who came out with the version that on 8.7.2011, he was going back to his house, after taking medicine for his daughter-in-law from Kala Afgana, when at about 6.30 p.m. he had covered some distance from the cremation ground of village Nana Chak, he saw that the present petition





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top