PARAMJEET SINGH, SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Pyare Lal – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commissioner, Haryana – Respondent
Mr. Paramjeet Singh, J.: - The instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of order dated 06.03.2006 (Annexure P/7) passed by the Commissioner, whereby order dated 03.03.1999 (Annexure P/4) passed by the Assistant Collector First Grade, Hansi, under Section 13-A of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) , as applicable in the State of Haryana, has been set aside and the appeal of the respondent-Gram Panchayat has been allowed declaring respondent – Gram Panchayat of Village Sisiabola, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar, as owner of land measuring 32 kanals and also for quashing of order dated 29.05.2007 (Annexure P/8) passed by the Financial Commissioner, whereby the revision petition of the petitioner has been dismissed.
2. On 24.02.2010, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court passed the following order:-
“Counsel for the petitioner submits that jamabandis Annexures P-1 and P-2 clearly record that the petitioner is in possession as a tenant on payment of 1/3rd batai. This fact alone entitles the petitioner to a declaration that he is a tenant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.