SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 112

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Dharam Vir – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Book Binder – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s):Mr. Vikram Anand, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s): None

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.: - This order shall dispose of two revision petitions bearing CR-7096-2011 [for short “first petition”] and CR-7842-2011 [for short “second petition”] both titled as `Dharam Vir Vs. Raj Kumar Book Binder’.

2. In the first petition, the petitioner has challenged orders dated 02.11.2011 (Annexure P-4) and dated 04.11.2011 (Annexure P-6) both passed by the learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar, whereas in the second petition, order dated 05.12.2011 (Annexure P-6) has been challenged which has been passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Jalandhar.

3. Petitioner Dharam Vir is the landlord who is owner of the house in which one room is in possession of Raj Kumar as a tenant. The landlord filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [for short “the Act”] on 19.12.2008 to which written statement was filed on 12.03.2010 and replication was filed on 28.04.2010. The learned Rent Controller assessed the provisional rent on 05.10.2011 for the period w.e.f. 08.10.1997 to 07.01.2009 @ Rs.525/- per month, amounting to Rs.70,875/-, interest of Rs.24,097.50/- and costs of Rs.500/-, total amounting to Rs.95,472.50/-. The ten










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top