SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1598

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Gurinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate,
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-20803-2011:Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate,
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-20407-2011 &
CRM-M-19588-2011:Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-19686-2011:Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-8122-2011:Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-16670-2011:Mr. A.P.S. Rehan, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-17672-2011:Mr. T.S. Sangha, Senior Advocate, with Mr. J.S. Jalli, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-18406-2011:Mr. N.P.S. Mann, Advocate, with Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-19401-2011:Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-12624-2011:Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-7097-2011:Mr. S.S. Sidhu, Advocate.
For the Petitioner in CRM-M-12299-2011:Mr. Jitender Singh Dadwal, Advocate.
for the complainant in CRM-M-12624-2011:Ms. Niti Wadhawan, Advocate, for Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate.
For the State of Punjab in all the cases: Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, DAG, Punjab.
2004 (SC) 3020. (Paras 1 & 2)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.: - I shall be disposing of 13 regular bail applications filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [for short “Cr.P.C.”]. The details of all the 13 cases are as under: -

1 & 2. CRM-M-20589-2011 titled as ‘Gurinder Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and CRM-M-20803-2011 titled as ‘Kashmiri Lal Vs. State of Punjab’ arising out of FIR No.236 dated 24.12.2010, registered under Sections 22/25/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [for short “NDPS Act”], Police Station Machhiwara, District Ludhiana.

3. CRM-M-20407-2011 titled as ‘Parveen Kumar Vs. State of Punjab arising out of FIR No.44 dated 17.05.2011, registered under Sections 22/25/61/85 of the NDPS Act, Police Station City Samana, District Patiala.

4. CRM-M-19588-2011 titled as ‘Sanjiv Kumar Vs. State of Punjab arising out of FIR No.45 dated 17.05.2011, registered under Sections 22/25/61/85 of the NDPS Act, Police Station City Samana, District Patiala.

5. CRM-M-19686-2011 titled as ‘Rajinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab arising out of FIR No.47 dated 30.01.2011, registered under Sections 22/61/85 of the NDPS Act, Police Station City Sangrur, District San























































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top