SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 192

L.N.MITTAL
Sandeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Siri Pal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G. S. Sandhu, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. L.N. Mittal, J.: (Oral) - Defendant Sandeep Kumar has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 03.11.2011, (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Karnal, thereby striking off defence of the petitioner for not filing written statement.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file.

3. Counsel for the petitioner prays that only one opportunity of short duration may be granted to the defendant-petitioner for filing written statement, on payment of cost.

4. I have carefully considered the aforesaid prayer.

5. Perusal of the impugned order reveals that defendant-petitioner put in appearance through counsel in the trial court on 23.05.2011 and availed of five opportunities, spread over more than five months, for filing written statement, but did not file the same till 03.11.2011, when the trial court was forced to pass the impugned order. Order 8 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure stipulates that the defendant has to file written statement within 30 days, but not later than 90 days from the date of service of summons. The said provision, being rule o





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top