2012(1) LAW HERALD (P&H) (DB) 903
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(DIVISION BENCH)
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.S. Saron
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik
CRA No.891-DB of 2006
Jassa Singh
v.
State of Punjab
{Decided on 31/01/2012}
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Ss.376(2)(F) & 376(1)--Rape--Committed with step daughter--Modification of conviction from offence under S.376(2)(F) to under S.376(1) and Sentence of imprisonment reduced from RI for life to RI for 10 years.
(B) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Ss.376(1) & 376(2)(F)--Rape--Age of prosecutrix--Rape committed with step daughter--Characteristics mentioned do create a doubt as regards age of the prosecutrix being less than 12 years on the date of occurrence--Keeping in view ‘Secondary Sex Characters’ and the fact that the date of birth as given in certificates are on the basis of dates given by PW1 Mother of Prosecutrix benefit of doubt as regards age of the prosecutrix (PW3) is liable to be given to appellant--Instead of offence under Section 376(2)(f) IPC, the case would fall under Section 376(1) IPC--Sentence modified. (Para 24)
(C) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Ss.376(1) & 376(2)(f)--Rape--Committed with step daughter--In case of rape, when the testimony of prosecutrix inspires confidence other attending circumstances are not such which are to be given unnecessary weightage--There is no need for corroboration of the testimony of a prosecutrix in sexual offences and the Courts do not have hesitation in accepting her evidence--However, in view of the fact that the offence under Section 376(2)(f) is not made out, the appellant is liable to be convicted for the offence under Section 376(1) IPC. (Paras 26 & 27)
Mr. S.S. Saron, J.: - This appeal has been filed by the appellant Jassa Singh alias Jaswant Singh against the judgment and order dated 27.10.2006 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mansa whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376 (2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC” – for short) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life; besides, pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for 2 years. In case of recovery of fine, it has been ordered that an amount of Rs.40,000/- shall be deposited in a fixed deposit receipt (FDR) in the name of the prosecutrix, which she will be able to withdraw on attaining the age of majority.
2. The FIR (Ex.PN) in the case has been registered on the statement (Ex.PB) of the prosecutrix (PW3) aged 12 years. It is stated by the prosecutrix that she is a resident of Fatehpur and studying in the 6th class in Government High School, Fatehpur. Her date of birth is 11.11.1993. About 10 years earlier to her making the statement (Ex.PB), which was made on 21.8.2005, the mother of the prosecutrix namely Karamjit Kaur alias Seeto (PW1) along with her started living with Jassa Singh (appellant) resident of Fatehpur. The mother of the prosecutrix had told her that her previous husband namely Jaila Singh i.e. father of the prosecutrix resident of Behniwal was addicted to drugs and had left her. The mother of the prosecutrix along with the prosecutrix had, therefore, started living with Jassa Singh alias Jaswant Singh (appellant) son of Baggar Singh alias Chota resident of Fatehpur. The prosecutrix had one brother namely Ranjit Singh aged about 9 years. The said facts came to the knowledge of the prosecutrix after these were disclosed to her by her mother.
3. On the day of Lohri of 13.01.2005, the mother of the prosecutrix along with the brother of the prosecutrix had gone to her parents’ house at village Jhabbar. The prosecutrix and her father Jassa Singh (appellant) remained at their house. In view of the festival of Lohri, the father of the prosecutrix namely Jassa Singh had consumed substantial liquor. After taking their meals, the prosecutrix and her father went to sleep in a room. The time must be around 9/10.00 p.m. at night that Jassa Singh (appellant) father of the prosecutrix came and lay on her cot. He threatened the prosecutrix to remain lying down quietly and in case she raised an alarm, he would kill her. The father of the prosecutrix forcibly removed her ‘salwar’. The prosecutrix said that a father does not do such an act with her own daughter and that she was her daughter; besides, she stated not to do any wrong act with her. Despite, the prosecutrix stopping her father Jassa Singh (appellant), he forcibly committed rape on her. She being a young girl could not resist him. The prosecutrix further stated that she wept for a considerable time, but her father made her quite after scaring her and then she lay down. She was stained with blood and her clothes also got stained with blood which her father washed in the morning. On account of fear, she did not disclose the said incident to anyone. On 4.8.2005, the mother of the prosecutrix had gone to Kaithal. She (prosecutrix) and her father (appellant) were alone at home and on that night also, her father forcibly committed rape on her. Her father used to say that he had been to jail many times and many cases were registered against him. He also threatened the prosecutirx that if she disclosed anything to anyone, he would kill her. A day earlier to the prosecutrix making her statement on 21.08.2005 i.e. on 20.8.2005, her mother again along with her brother was getting ready to go to the house of the maternal grandfather of the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix then started crying in front of her mother and she asked the prosecutrix as to why was she crying and asked her as to what was the matter. The prosecutrix then narrated as to all that had happ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.