2012(2) LAW HERALD (P&H) (DB) 1080
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(DIVISION BENCH)
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Civil Writ Petition No.16387 of 2009
Nivedita Sharma
v.
State of Haryana & Ors.
{Decided on 19/03/2012}
(A) Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, S.3-C--The basement is not transferable independently--However, there can be proportionate right in the basement in respect of common services.
Section 3-C of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, permits transfer, sale, gift, exchange or lease of an independent dwelling unit--It also restricts that there can be only three dwelling units on a residential plot--The basement is not an independent residential floor--Therefore, the same is not transferable independently--The Circular mentioned above, provides for transfer of the basement along with the ground floor or to have proportionate right in the basement in respect of common services.
There was no specific statutory provision empowering the State Government to issue such circular prior to insertion of Section 3C in the Act--But such circular would be in exercise of the Executive Powers of the State Government under Article 162 of the Constitution of India--Such circular is not contradicting any statutory provisions--The basement is not habitable and the dwelling unit, therefore, it cannot be transferred as an independent unit. (Para 11 to 13)
(B) Constitution of India, Art.14--There is no equality in illegality. (Para 14)
Mr. Hemant Gupta, J.: - The petitioner has challenged the legality of the circular dated 27.3.2009 (Annexure P.3) issued by the Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Town and Country Planning Department, as violative of the provisions of the Constitution of India.
2. The petitioner relies upon an agreement to sell dated 10.1.2008 in respect of purchase of the basement of a residential building bearing Number F-5/5 measuring 550 sq. ft. in a licenced plotted colony “DLF Qutab Enclave”, Phase-I, Gurgaon, entered with Rahul Bansal. The said Rahul Bansal has purchased the property from a builder, namely, Shri Vikram Vij on 12.3.2001. It is alleged that the Government has stopped registration of individual floors without any valid reasons. The petitioner alleges that a circular has been issued on 27.3.2009 whereby the floor-wise registration of the property has been permitted, but it is stipulated therein that basement cannot be registered independently and can be registered only along with the ground floor. It is the said circular, which is challenged by the petitioner, in the present writ petition.
3. In support of the plea that the sale deed in respect of the basement alone can be registered, in the replication filed by the petitioner, a reference is made to a sale deed dated 25.1.2010 executed by Mrs. Saroj Verma on favour of one Shri Baljeet Singh Rathee.
4. In the written statement, the respondents have pointed out that on 23.7.2009, the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 (for short ‘the Act’) was amended when Section 3-C was inserted by Haryana Ordinance No 7 of 2009, since substituted by Haryana Act No.18 of 2009. Section 3-C contemplated transfer, sale, gift, exchange, lease in perpetuity of independent dwelling units in any residential colony, which has been granted licence under the aforesaid Act. The proviso to said provision contemplates that the registration shall be limited to the dwelling limit of each floor with an overall unit of three dwelling units on each residential plot. It is also pointed out that the basement in a residential plot is free of Floor Area Ratio and is meant for the use of bona-fide residents of the plot and is not allowed to be sold to any other party for any other independent use. The circular issued on 27.3.2009 clarifies that the basement, if any, allowed in a residential building shall not constitute a separate sub division/floor. However, in case owners of different independent floors in building intend and agree to use basement as a common area for facilities such as parking or other plant and equipment required for different floors in the building they may have undivided proportionate right in the basement.
5. In a reply filed on behalf of the Tehsildar, Gurgaon, it is pointed out that the State Government has issued a Notification on 25.9.2002 in exercise of Section 7-A of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Area Act, 1975 whereby, the area of Gurgaon as specified in Schedule given in the said Notification, was declared as an urban area. After declaration of such area as urban area, the District Town Planner Enforcement, Gurgaon, has written a letter dated 17.12.2002 to the Tehsildar Gurgaon not to register any sale deed in which the seller had sub-divided the plots/floor in the licenced colony, other than the multistorey Group Housing Colonies. Vide the aforesaid letter, the floor wise execution of the sale deed was not permitted, but after the circular dated 27.3.2009, the prohibition has been removed.
6. In reply dated 9.9.2010 to the rejoinder, it is explained by the Tehsildar that in the year 2001, there was no bar to register sale deed in respect of only basement, but thereafter, due to amendments in the statutory provisions, the execution of sale deed in respect of a basement is not permissible. In respect of the sale deed dated 25.1.2010, it is pointed out that the sale deed was of a ground floor a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.