2012(2) LAW HERALD (P&H) 1208
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vijender Singh Malik
Crl. Appeal No.252-SB of 2003
Rupinder Singh
v.
State of Punjab
{Decided on 01/03/2012}
(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.15--Acquittal--Non joining of independent witness and Contradictory statement of official witnesses regarding conduct of investigation--Individually none of the circumstance may be sufficient to hold the prosecution case as doubtful, however, taken collectively, they are sufficient to support the view that the prosecution case is doubtful. (Para 24)
(B) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.15--Non joining of independent witness--Acquittal--Admittedly the place of recovery was in middle of town and there homes around the place of recovery--Plea that so did not they to call any persons from the locality at that the because it was night time--Rejected in view of that official witness that constables arranged weights and measures with 10-15 minutes on foot.
Had the statement of Rajesh Kumar, SI been to this effect only, it could be said that he did not try to disturb the sleep of the neighbours and in this way he had shown a gentlemanly gesture towards them--However, this cannot be believed to be the reason for Rajesh Kumar, SI for not calling the neighbours to witness the recovery--It is a case where the weights and scale had been procured from the spot by Constable Jaggu Ram--The only two witnesses of recovery in this case have stated that Constable Jaggu Ram brought the weights and scales within 10 to 15 minutes and that he had gone to procure the same on foot, which shows that he had brought the same from the neighbourhood of the place of recovery--So it is a clear case where the prosecution failed to prove that any attempt was made to join independent witness in the raid and recovery despite their being secret information about the accused keeping in his possession large quantity of poppy husk. (Para 17)
(C) Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.15--Acquittal--Contradictory Statements of official witness with regard to place of sitting of officers during investigation.
Alongwith these circumstances, there is an important contradiction in the statements of the official witnesses regarding the place where they remained sitting during the proceedings at the spot and how they conducted the writing work--Bhupinder Singh, HC (PW-2) says that the writing work was done by him while sitting in the back portion of Allwyn Nissan--Bhupinder Singh, HC has further stated that accused was also sitting in the said vehicle and DSP Gursharan Singh Bedi was also sitting therein--He then made a comprehensive statement to the effect that Rajesh Kumar, SI contradicts him on this aspect--He says that the entire writing work was done at the spot while sitting on the ground--According to him, the DSP, however, remained standing--Stating about himself, he has said that he was also sitting on the ground and that it took four or five hours in completing the writing work, which was done while sitting at the spot. (Para 20)
Mr. Vijender Singh Malik, J.: - Rupinder Singh, appellant has brought this appeal against the judgment dated 06.01.2003 of his conviction for an offence punishable under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ( for short ‘the Act’) passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Patiala and the order on sentence of the same date vide which he has been ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- with further rigorous imprisonment for six months in default of payment of fine. The case registered by Police Station Samana against the appellant by way of FIR No.513 dated 23.11.1999 is as under:-
2. On 23.11.1999 at about 9.30 PM Rajesh Kumar, Sub Inspector alongwith Head Constable Bhupinder Singh and some other police officials was present at Bhawanigarh Chowk Samana in connection with nakabandi. There he received a secret information to the effect that Rupinder Singh alias Rupa son of Joginder Singh, resident of Malkana Patti Majri Samana is in the habit of keeping and selling poppy husk and that if raid was conducted, then poppy husk in heavy quantity could be recovered. Finding the information to be reliable, Rajesh Kumar, SI had sent a ruqa to the police station for registration of the case and before starting for the place where the appellant was said to be available with poppy husk, he had sent information to DSP Gursharan Singh Bedi by way of wireless message to reach the spot, being a Gazetted Officer. On the writing received from Rajesh Kumar, SI, a case was registered at the police station by Darshan Singh, ASI. Rajesh Kumar, SI reached Malkana Patti Majri Samana. In the light of the vehicle, Rajesh Kumar SI was riding, he saw a man sitting on two bags. Rupinder Singh was apprehended and on inquiry he told his name as Rupinder Singh. Rajesh Kumar, SI told him that he suspected poppy husk in the bags he was sitting on and that he intended to conduct search of the same. The accused was given the option of search of the bags in the presence of some Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. The accused exercised the option for search in the presence of a Gazetted Officer. The option given to the appellant was reduced to writing, which was signed by the accused and attested by the witnesses. In the meanwhile, DSP Gursharan Singh Bedi reached the spot. He disclosed his identity to the accused and told him that he was a Gazetted Officer. The accused was, however, given the option of his search by him or by a Magistrate. The accused had expressed confidence in the DSP for his search. Memo of this option was also prepared, which was signed by the accused and attested by the witnesses. In the presence of the DSP, Rajesh Kumar, SI conducted the search of the bags, which were found to contain poppy husk. Two samples from each bag weighing 250 grams were taken out from the two bags. They were converted into separate parcels. The remaining poppy husk was found to be 34 kg. 500 grams in each bag. The bags were also given the shape of parcels and they were sealed by Rajesh Kumar, SI with his seal bearing impression ‘RK’. The DSP had also affixed his seal ‘GS’ thereon. Seal after use was handed over by Rajesh Kumar, SI to HC Bhupinder Singh while the DSP retained the seal with him. The sealed parcels were then taken into possession by way of recovery memo. A rough site plan of the place of recovery was prepared by Rajesh Kumar, SI. He recorded the statements of the witnesses under section 161 Cr.P.C. and arrested the accused. In the meanwhile, special report of the case was sent from the police station to the Illaqa Magistrate through Sukchain Singh, Constable. Rajesh Kumar, SI produced the case property and the accused before SI Manjit Singh, SHO after reaching the police station, who had verified the investigation and had put his seal bearing impression ‘MS’ on the case property. Rajesh Kumar, SI then deposited the case property with the MHC and the accused was put in the
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.