SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 405

RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Kuljinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Chetan Nanda – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G.S. Virk, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.: - By way of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the complainant has approached this Court for quashing of order dated 14.9.2009 (Annexure P-2), whereby the accused were discharged in case/FIR No.54 dated 20.4.2007 registered under Section 363/511/34 IPC at P.S. City Gurdaspur and further order dated 22.12.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Ad hoc), Fast Track Court, Gurdaspur, whereby revision petition filed by the State against the aforesaid order of discharge was dismissed.

2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, from the facts of the case, attempt to abduct the prosecutrix with intention to secretly and wrongly confine her, is established on record and thus, the basic ingredients to constitute offence under Section 365/511/34 IPC are clearly made out against both the accused. It has been averred that inspite of making application dated 7.7.2009 for framing charges under Section 365/511/34 IPC, the trial Court has not even framed the charges against the accused under Section 363/511/34 IPC, for which, the FIR in question was registered.

3. To elaborate his arguments further, learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemen















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top