SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 527

VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Surender Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Laliet Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Vijender Singh Malik, J.:- Surender Sharma has brought this petition under the provisions of section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 81 dated 9.6.2011 registered at Police Station Ballabgarh, District Faridabad for an offence punishable under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with section 120-B of Indian Penal Code. The brief facts necessary to be noticed to appreciate the case of the petitioner are as under:-

2. The complainant, Bhim Singh, after sale of his land, had a corpus of Rs. 11.00 crores with him. He wanted to invest the said amount in property for appreciation. Since the petitioner had been working as a property dealer at Old Faridabad and had been visiting the complainant, being his distant relation, the complainant was asked by him to invest the money in some property. The petitioner had shown him three different properties. The complainant paid a sum of Rs. 4,20,00,000/- in cash through different self cheques. The petitioner, however, did not get any sale deed executed in favour of the complainant. When the complainant pressed the petitioner for transfer of land, the petitioner executed a sale deed on 11.8.2006
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top