SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2339

RAJESH BINDAL
Sarabjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Avtar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Gulzar Mohd, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rajesh Bindal J.:- Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment of the learned court below whereby petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, “the Act”) for declaring their marriage null and void, was allowed.

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the marriage of the parties was solemnised as per Sikh rites in the year 1998 at Goraya Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar. The marriage was consummated but no child was born out of wedlock. It was alleged that after some time of the marriage, the respondent started harassing and beating the appellant and treated her with cruelty. The respondent husband is presently living in Italy. The respondent filed a petition under Section 11 of the Act. The appellant filed reply to the petition. The learned court below after considering the evidence on record, allowed the petition filed by the respondent-husband for declaring the marriage null and void vide judgment dated 8.5.2009. Aggrieved against the judgment of the learned court below, the appellant-wife filed appeal before this court.

3. During the pendency of the appeal, the wife filed application under Section 2











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top