SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2955

SABINA
Anupama @ Prabhjot Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicant:Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sabina, J.: - Complainant had filed the complaint under Section 406,498-A of Indian Penal Code against the accused-respondents. Vide order dated 29.7.2009, passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gurdaspur, the complaint qua respondents was dismissed. Hence, the present application has been filed by the complainant/appellant under Section 378(4) Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer for grant of leave to file an appeal against the order mentioned above.

2. The case of the complainant, as noticed by the trial Court in para No.1 of its judgment, reads as under :-

“Complainant has filed this complaint against the accused persons under Section 406, 498-A IPC on the allegations that she was married with accused No.1 on 7.11.1997 as per Hindu Rites at Village Kahnuwan. At the time of marriage, huge dowry articles were given to all the accused. Out of said wedlock no child was born and the relation between the parties remained cordial for few months. Thereafter, the accused No.1 along with all the accused started raising demand of more dowry as they were not satisfied with the dowry articles give by the parents of the complainant at the time of marriage and the same wer







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top