SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 97

RAM CHAND GUPTA
Bansi Lal Memorial Trust, Bhiwani, Chandigarh – Appellant
Versus
Shruti Choudhry – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Ram Chand Gupta, J.(Oral) - C.M.Nos.637-638 CII of 2011

Requests for placing on record Annexures P1 to P9.

Both the applications are allowed. Annexures P1 to P9 are taken on record subject to all just exceptions.

Further contends that last page of Annexure P3, at page 50 of the paper-book has not been correctly typed and hence, request is made to replace the same with another page filed today.

The same is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.

Civil Revision No.159 of 2011

2. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter to be referred as ‘CPC’) for setting aside impugned order dated 21.12.2010, passed by learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Bhiwani, Annexure P10, vide which the application of the plaintiff for returning the written statement dated 7.12.2009, filed by the petitioner- Ch.Bansi Lal Memorial Trust, Bhiwani, Chandigarh, (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Trust’), Annexure P4, was allowed.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner-Trust and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by le











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top