SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2893

2011(1) Law Herald (P&H) 355
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jora Singh
CRA-S-1707-SB of 2002
Hans Raj
v.
State of Haryana
{Decided on 13/10/2010}

Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.S. Chahal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Goyal, AAG, Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Arora, AAG, Haryana.

IMPORTANT POINTS
Narcotic--Acquittal--Secret information received so was not reduced into writing and was not sent to any senior officer.

Headnote:Narcotic--Acquittal--Seal impressions of the seal used were not prepared after sealing the case property either at the spot or at the police station--Report of the chemical examiner to the effect that seals on the sealed parcels were found intact and were tallying with the seal impression cannot said to be correct one.

       (A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Ss.15 & 42--Acquittal--Police party on receiving the secret information conducted raid--Information received so was not reduced into writing and was not sent to any senior officer--Violation of section 42 of the Act.

       (B) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Ss.15 & 42--Acquittal--Police party on receiving the secret information conducted raid--On seeing the police party person sitting on the gunny bags fled away from the spot--Prosecution case that it was appellant who ran away from the spot was known earlier to the police officials--No case was registered against the appellant except the present one--He had not gone to the police station in connection with any case--Prosecution story that he was earlier known to the police officials held unnatural and cannot be relied upon.

       (C) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Ss.15 & 42--Acquittal--Raid conducted by arranging private vehicle--Registration number of the vehicle, name of the driver of the vehicle or name of the owner was not mentioned in the Ruqa or in the case diary--Even the driver of the vehicle was not requested to attest any document--Held; story of the prosecution that the raid by the police party by arranging private vehicle was unnatural and cannot be relied upon.

       (D) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Ss.15 & 42--Acquittal--Seal impression--Police searched the gunny bags and the same were found to be containing poppy husk--After separating the samples, sample parcels and the remaining poppy husk in the same gunny bags were sealed separately with the seal impression--Seal after its use was not handed over to independent witness--Seal retained by the police (DSP) without preparing impression--Held; possibility of tampering with the case property cannot be ruled out.

       (E) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Ss.15 & 42--Acquittal--Seal impressions of the seal used were not prepared after sealing the case property either at the spot or at the police station--Hence no question of depositing the seal impression with the incharge of Malkhana and thereafter in the office of chemical examiner--Report of the chemical examiner to the effect that seals on the sealed parcels were found intact and were tallying with the seal impression cannot said to be correct one.

       

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jora Singh, J.: - Hans Raj, preferred this appeal to challenge the judgment of conviction dated 4.10.2002 and order of sentence dated 5.10.2002, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, in Sessions Case No. 48 of 2.8.2001, arising out of FIR No. 20 dated 21.1.2001, registered under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’), at Police Station Adampur.

2. By the said judgment, he was convicted under Section 15 of the Act and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of one year.

3. Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 21.1.2001, police party headed by ASI Siri Bhagwan, on a private vehicle was going from the side of village Bhodia towards village Bhana then received a secret information to the effect that Hans Raj S/o Ramu @ Ram Naraian R/o village Bhana, was indulging in selling of poppy husk at his farm house. In case there is a raid then heavy quantity of poppy husk can be recovered. Taking the information to be credible ASI Siri Bhagwan alongwith the police party after joining Chabil Dass, Chowkidar, had gone to the Dhani of Hans Raj. When the police party was near the Dhani of Hans Raj then a young person was seen while sitting on the gunny bags who on seeing the police party ran away from the spot. An effort was made by the police party to apprehend that person but he managed to escape. Name of the person who had fled away from the spot was Hans Raj S/o Ramu @ Ram Narain. He was previously known to the police officials. Investigating Officer, suspected some contraband in the gunny bags. Gunny bags were 3 in numbers. Constable Vijay Singh, was sent to Police Station Adampur, to request the Deputy Superintendent of Police, City Hisar, to reach at the spot. DSP Jagdish Nagar, alongwith his staff and Constable Vijay Singh, came at the spot. In the presence of DSP Jagdish Nagar, ASI Siri Bhagwan, had searched the gunny bags lying on the spot. On search, the gunny bags were found containing poppy husk. 200 grams of poppy husk was separated from each bag to serve as sample and on weighment remaining poppy husk was found to be 39 Kg 800 grams in each bag. Samples and the remaining poppy husk in the same bags were sealed separately with the seal bearing impression ‘JN’ of DSP Jagdish Nagar. Seal after its use was kept by the DSP. Case property was taken into police possession vide recovery memo Ex. P-9 attested by the witnesses. Rough site plan with correct marginal notes was prepared. Statements of the witnesses were also recorded. Ruqa Ex. P-20 was sent to the police station on the basis of which formal FIR was recorded.

4. On return to the police station case property was produced before SI/SHO Prem Singh. After verifying the investigation and checking the case property, SHO had affixed his own seal on the sealed parcels bearing impression ‘PSK’. Case property was deposited by the Investigating Officer with the incharge of the Malkhana.

5. On 18.4.2001, accused had surrendered before the Magistrate at Hisar. Application was moved for joining the accused in the investigation of the case. As per order of the Court accused was joined in the investigation of the case. Sample parcels were sent to the office of the Chemical Examiner and as per report Ex. P-16 of the Chemical Examiner, contents of the sample parcels were found to be of poppy husk. After completion of investigation, challan was presented in the Court.

6. Accused was charge-sheeted under Section 15 of the Act, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

7. In order to substantiate its case prosecution examined number of witnesses.

8. PW-1 HC Suresh Kumar and PW-2 Constable Ramesh Chander, tendered their affidavits Ex. P-1 and Ex. P-2, respectively.

9. PW-3 SI Prem Singh, was the SHO of Police Station Adampur. Case property alo




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top