M.M. KUMAR, J.

1. The action of the respondents in not permitting the petitioner to appear in the interview despite the call letter issued by the respondents is the subject matter of challenge in the instant petition. The name of the petitioner is registered with the Employment Exchange, Pundri, Kaithal. His name was sponsored for appointment on the post of Health Assistant (Seasonal). According to the requisition received by the Employment Exchange, Kaithal from the Civil Surgeon, Kaithal (Annexure R/1) it has been clearly specified that five posts of Health Assistants -Swashyasahayak (Seasonal) for a period of 3 1/2 months were required to be filled. A requisition was sent on 7.6.2005 in compliance to the provisions of Section 4 of the Employment Exchange Compulsory Notification of Vacancies Act, 1959. The nature of the vacancies is seasonal and the type of work required to be handled was fogging operation of malathion technical. The date of interview was specified to be 24.6.2005. However, respondents asked the petitioner to appear for interview on 4.7.2005 before the Civil Surgeon, Kaithal (respondent no.2). When the petitioner appeared before the Civil Surgeon, Kaitha