SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 913

VINOD K.SHARMA
Avtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Surjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Vinod K. Sharma, J. (Oral):- This regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2009, passed by the learned Courts below, vide which suit for mandatory injunction filed by the plaintiff / appellant has been ordered to be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff / appellant filed a suit for mandatory injunction directing the defendant / respondent to clear all the encumbrances upon the vehicle bearing registration No. PB-23-2212, and further to hand over the original RC and affidavit to the plaintiff. The injunction was also sought restraining the defendant from interfering into the peaceful use of the truck by the plaintiff / appellant.

3. The suit was contested, wherein the defendant denied having sold the truck to the plaintiff / appellant. The defendant also denied having executed any receipt as alleged in the plaint. The receipt was said to be forged and fabricated document.

4. The learned Courts below on appreciation of evidence, have recorded a concurrent finding of fact that the plaintiff was not entitled to mandatory or permanent injunction. The reason for coming to this conclusion was that the plaintiff did not produce the receipt, alleged to ha















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top