SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1381

ALOK SINGH
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Phoola Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab.
For the Respondents:Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Alok Singh, J. (Oral).:- This is the defendants’ second appeal assailing judgment and decree dated 25.9.1986 passed by learned trial Court/Sub- Judge, Ist Class, Amritsar and judgment and decree dated 18.5.1987 passed by learned first Appellate Court/Addl. District Judge, Amritsar. Both the Courts below have decreed suit of the plaintiffs (herein respondents) for permanent prohibitory injunction and for mandatory injunction directing the defendants (herein appellants) to receive balance installments of the sale consideration and then to execute the conveyance deed in favour of plaintiffs/respondents.

2. The brief facts of the present case are that plaintiffs had filed suit with the allegation that plaintiffs are in possession of the land measuring 41 kanals fully described in the plaint; Land was banjar Kallar and was fit for cultivation; Plaintiffs had spent more than Rs.10,000/- over the land; Suit land was undisposed off evacuee agricultural land; Tehsildar (Sales-cum-Mahal) Tarn Taran invited applications from the occupants of such lands for the transfer of the same to them on the basis of possession from Rabi, 1978; Plaintiffs being in occupation of the aforesaid land



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top