SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1678

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Ajmel Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kulwinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.P.S. Mann, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Rakesh Kumar Jain J.:- Plaintiff has filed this revision petition against the order of Additional District Judge (Ad hoc), Fast Tract Court, Ludhiana, dismissing the miscellaneous appeal filed by the plaintiff vide his order dated 18.10.2008 against the order dated 28.02.2007 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ludhiana, whereby an application, filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) was disposed of by the trial Court directing both the parties to maintain status quo with regard to possession over the suit property till the final disposal of the main case.

2. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction in order to restrain defendants from interfering in his peaceful possession over the two shops falling in property No.11/12 situated at Jawahar Nagar, Ludhiana. Pleaded case of the plaintiff is that he along with his brother Kuldeep Singh (since deceased) took one of the above said shops falling in property No.11/12 from Morni Devi Wd/o Sh. Mangal Sain in the year 1984 @ Rs.300/- per month and the other shop in the year 1989 @ Rs.470/- per month. There was a relation










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top