SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1626

KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: None.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral):- The present appeal has been instituted by Santosh Kumar son of Ram Narain, resident of village Aliganj Loharai Darwaja Aliganj, District Etah (Uttar Pradesh). He was named as an accused in case FIR No. 187 dated 28.10.1997, registered at Police Station City, Moga, under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as “1985 Act”).

2. This Court has passed various orders to effect service upon the appellant. On 21.5.2009, this Court had directed the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga, to issue notice to the appellant and his sureties as to why coercive method be not initiated against them. On 20.10.2009, this Court ordered that bailable warrants be issued and explanation of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga, be called as to why bailable warrants had not been executed.

3. Before this Court could pass any other order, Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, has brought to the notice of this Court that the appellant has undergone seven years six months and 21 days, out of ten year’s sentence, awarded to him. He has placed on record affidavit of Roop Kumar, Superintende






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top