SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2557

ALOK SINGH
Satwant Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Alok Singh, J.:- Landlady – revisionist has invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), challenging the judgment dated 10.06.2006 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Amritsar, as well as judgment/order dated 10.03.2008 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Amritsar, thereby dismissing the eviction petition filed by the landlady - revisionist.

2. Landlady – revisionist has filed eviction petition under Section 13 of the Act on the ground that tenant is in arrears of rent from 01.08.1998 to 31.07.1999 at the rate of Rs.660/- per month amounting to Rs.7920, from 01.08.1999 to 31.07.2000 at the rate of Rs.690/-, amounting to Rs.8280/-from 01.08.2000 to 31.07.2001 at the rate of Rs.720/-, amounting to Rs.8640/-, from 1.8.2001 to 31.07.2002 at the rate of Rs.750/- amounting to Rs.9000/-, from 1.8.2002 to 31.7.2003 at the rate of Rs.780/- amounting to Rs.9360/-, and from 1.8.2003 to 31.07.2004 at the rate of Rs.810/- amounting to Rs.9720/- in all Rs.52,920/- and also failed to pay house tax at the rate of 15% per annum. According to the landlady, initially r


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top