SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2956

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, JORA SINGH
Pinki – Appellant
Versus
Anil – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant:Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate.

ORDER

Jora Singh, J:. - Pinki daughter of Murari Lal filed this application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. for leave to appeal to challenge the judgment dated 10.2.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Bhiwani, in Sessions Case No.77 of 18.12.2009, arising out of private complaint under Sections 376/511/506 IPC.

2. By the said judgment, Anil and Manoj, respondents No.1 and 2, were acquitted of the charges levelled against them.

3. Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 8.10.2008, private complaint under Sections 376/511/354/342/506/34 IPC was instituted by the applicant against Anil and Manoj on the allegation that marriage of applicant was solemnised on 29.4.2006 with Manoj. After marriage, inlaws of the applicant started harassing and maltreating her on account of demand of dowry. Private complaint was filed by the applicant and as per order of the Court, FIR No.268 dated 19.7.2008 under Sections 498- A/406/506/323 IPC was registered. During investigation, accused assured the applicant and her family members not to harass her for want of dowry and also filed affidavits in this regard. As per assurance by the in-laws, applicant had gone to her matrimonial ho





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top