SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 148

S.S.SARON, JORA SINGH
Gurmeet Singh @ Pinky – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Present:Mr. Vinod Ghai, Advocate, for Gurmeet Singh @ Pinky, appellant in Crl.Appeal No.56-DB of 2007.
Mr. R.S. Bains, Advocate, for the petitioners in Crl.Revision Nos.2507 of 2006, 295 and 296 of 2007
Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Mandeep Kaushik, Advocate, for Ravinder Singh @ Bittu Gill, respondent, in Crl.Appeals No.498-DBA of 2007 and 1112-SBA of 2007 and Crl.Revision Nos.2507 of 2006, 295 and 296 of 2007 Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate, for respondents Paramjit Singh @ Pammi and Parveen Kumar in Crl.Revision Nos.2507 of 2006, 295 and 296 of 2007.
Mr. J.S. Saneta, Advocate, for respondent Pawan Kumar in Crl.Revision Nos.2507 of 2006, 295 and 296 of 2007.
Mr. N.K. Sanghi, Addl.AG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jora Singh, J.: - By this common judgment, we propose to dispose of Crl. Appeal No.56-DB of 2007 (Gurmeet Singh @ Pinky vs. State of Punjab), Crl. Appeal No.498-DBA of 2007 (State of Punjab vs. Ravinder Singh @ Bittu Gill and others), Crl. Appeal No.1112-SBA of 2007 (State of Punjab vs. Ravinder Singh @ Bittu Gill and others), Crl.Revision No.2507 of 2006 (Amrik Singh vs. State of Punjab and others), Crl. Revision No.295 of 2007 (Amrik Singh vs. State of Punjab and others) and Crl.Revision No.296 of 2007 (Amrik Singh vs. State of Punjab and others), as the same have been preferred against the common judgment of conviction dated 30.9.2006 and order of sentence dated 17.10.2006 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar, in Sessions Case No.47 of 2001/2006, arising out of FIR No.10 dated 8.1.2001 under Sections 148/302/307/323/336/225 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, Police Station Division No.5, Ludhiana.

2. By the said judgment, Gurmeet Singh @ Pinky was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 302 IPC and Section 27(1) of the Arms Act and was directed to undergo imprisonment for lif


















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top