SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 557

RAM CHAND GUPTA
Abdul Gafoor – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. R.S. Athwal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. P.S. Paul, D.A.G., Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Ram Chand Gupta, J. (Oral) - The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.19 dated 4.2.2012 under Sections 452, 323, 324, 148 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station City Roopnagar, District Roopnagar.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned Sessions Judge, Ropar dismissing anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the petitioners.

3. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 29.3.2012 passed the following order:-

“Crl.M.No.18577 of 2012

Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Crl.M.No.M-8865 of 2012

Contends that no specific injury has been attributed to present petitioners. It is also contended that it is a case of version and cross-version and even as per version in the FIR, scuffle had taken between the parties and both the parties sustained injuries. It is also submitted that three persons from the side of petitioners also sustained injuries and two of them already arrested. Further submitted that all the injuries except one, which is on the nos









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top