K.KANNAN
Narinder Mohan Arya – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance – Respondent
Mr. K. Kannan, J.: (Oral) - The writ petition is at the instance of an employee, who was found to have been wrongly terminated from service by the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court between the same parties and reported as Narinder Mohan Arya Versus United India Insurance Company Limited-2006 (4) SCC 713. While finding that the termination had been unjustified and holding that the petitioner was entitled to the relief claimed by him, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in view of the fact that the petitioner had been facing litigation as far back as 1976, while directing reinstatement and keeping in view of the fact that no work had been taken from him, provided for only 50% of the back wages as payable. The back wages had been paid, but not without again a stiff fight from the petitioner to secure the reliefs through contempt petition. The back wages had again been calculated without reference to the increments which he would have normally earned and the revision of pay that had been admissible to the category of employees like him. The petitioner resorted to a writ petition earlier for granting the benefits along with his claim that he should have been treated as promoted from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.