Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.: - As identical questions of law and facts are involved, therefore, I propose to decide all the cases of petitioners-accused (developers), depicted in Schedule A and those of subsequent vendees/transferees, mentioned in Schedule B (attached herewith), by virtue of this common judgment, in order to avoid the repetition. However, the relevant facts and material, which need a necessary mention for the limited purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant petitions, extracted from main petitions (1) CRM No. M-51514 of 2007 titled as “M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Haryana State Pollution Control Board” of Schedule ‘A’ and (2) CRM No. M-880 of 2010 titled as “Arvinder S.Brara Vs. Haryana State Pollution Control Board” of Schedule ‘B’, would be referred in subsequent part of this judgment for ready reference in this context.

2. Exhibiting the deep concern of degradation of environmental indiscipline, adversely affecting the humanity at large, the United Nations Organization (U.N.O.) convened an International Conference on human environment w.e.f. 5th to 16th of June, 1972 at Stockholm, in which, the India