MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Prem Kumar Rattan – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.: (Oral) - The epitome of the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for the limited purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant petition and emanating from the record, is that one Girdhari Lal was serving as a Patwari in the revenue department of Punjab. He died on duty on 6.9.1983. His daughter Suman Devi was stated to have got the job of Clerk-cum-Typist on 22.7.1985 on priority basis in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Patiala. Dr. Ramesh Kumar (respondent No.2), son of Girdhari Lal, was claimed to have also got the job of Dispenser and then Assistant Medical Officer by concealing material facts on the same grounds on priority basis in the office of Director Ayurvedic, Punjab .
2. Levelling a variety of allegations and narrating the sequence of events, in all, the prosecution claimed that respondent No.2 got his indicated job on priority basis by concealing material facts and thus committed the fraud. Although petitioner-complainant Prem Kumar Rattan was not in any way aggrieved or connected with the affairs of employment of Dr. Ramesh Kumar (respondent No.2) by the Govt. of Punjab, but still,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.