RAM CHAND GUPTA
Harparkash Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Mr. Ram Chand Gupta, J.: (Oral) - The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.60 dated 28.02.2012 under Sections 323, 452, 506 447, 511, 380 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Tripri Town, Patiala, District Patiala.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala dismissing anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner.
3. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 29.03.2012 passed the following order:-
“CRM No.17550 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRM No. M- 8402 of 2012
Contends that it is a case of no injury and that, in fact, dispute, if any, is civil in nature. It is also submitted that petitioner is in possession of the property in dispute, which was purchased by the wife of present petitioner-Harinder Kaur, coaccused and that, in fact, complainant in the garb of present FIR, want to take forcible possession of the property in dispute from present petitioner.
Notice of motion to Advocate Ge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.