JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Mangla Dogra – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Malhotra – Respondent
JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J
1. This judgment of mine shall dispose of two Civil Revision Nos. 6337 of 2011 (titled “Dr. Mangla Dogra and Others v. Anil Kumar Malhotra and Others”) ; and 6017 of 2011, titled (“Ajay Kumar Pasricha and Others v. Anil Kumar Malhotra and Others”) which have been directed against the order dated 20.8.2011, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Chandigarh, vide which the application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11 Civil Procedure Code was dismissed.
2. The facts giving rise to these Civil Revisions originated from a matrimonial dispute between respondent No.1 Anil Kumar Malhotra and respondent No.2, Seema Malhotra. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 17.4.1994. Out of the wedlock, a male child was born on 14.2.1995. The parties resided at Panipat. Due to the hostilities and strained relations between the parties, Seema Malhotra along with her minor son had been staying with her parents at Chandigarh since 1999. Respondents No. 5 is the brother of respondent No.2, whereas respondent Nos. 3 & 4 are her parents. Respondent No. 1, Seema Malhotra filed an application under section 125 Cr.P.C claiming maintenance from the husband
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.