SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2143

RAJESH BINDAL
Snehlata – Appellant
Versus
Joginder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Bindal J - Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment of the learned court below whereby petition filed by the appellant-wife under Section 13 (1) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, “the Act”) for divorce, on the ground of cruelty, was dismissed.

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the marriage of the parties was solemnised as per Hindu rites on 4.12.1998 at village Kulana-Ki-Dhani. The marriage was consummated but no child was born out of the wedlock. It was alleged that after some time of the marriage, the respondent started harassing and beating the appellant and treated her with cruelty. The appellant filed a petition for divorce. The respondent filed reply to the petition. The learned court below after considering the evidence on record, dismissed the petition filed by the appellant-wife for divorce vide judgment dated 15.11.2008. Aggrieved against the judgment of the learned court below, the appellant-wife filed appeal before this court.

3. During the pendency of the appeal, the wife filed application under Section 24 of the Act for grant of maintenance pendente lite, as also the litigation expenses. Upon notice, the application wa












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top