SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 551

ALOK SINGH
Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL)

1. Very interesting and important question of law arises for consideration before this Court – as to whether an accused, who has been enlarged on regular bail by the Magistrate, shall have to seek fresh bail for the newly added offence during the investigation triable by Magistrate?

2. The facts of the present case inter alia are that present petitioner/accused was arrested for an offence under Sections 324/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Safidon, FIR case No.350 dated 18.11.2010. Accused was enlarged on regular bail by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Safidon, vide order dated 20.11.2010 for an offence under Sections 324/506/34 IPC P.S. Safidon. During the investigation, Sections 326 and 323 were also added against the accused. Accused thereafter had applied for anticipatory bail for newly added Sections i.e. 326 and 323 IPC, however, his bail application was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 12.1.2011, observing therein as under: -

“It is case of prosecution that on 17.11.2008 at 6.30 PM, an altercation had taken place between Parveen Kumar and Mahender with accused Rakesh, which ultimately led to a fighting, in wh










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top