SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 3386

RAJAN GUPTA
Garg Agro Chemicals – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Arun Chandra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Senior DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)

1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of complaint instituted under Section 27 (5) of the Insecticide Rules, 1971 for violation of Section 3 (k) (i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticide Act, 1968 and rules, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala and consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Brief factual background of the case is that Gurmit Singh, Insecticide Inspector, Patiala alongwith Jagdish Singh Sandhu, Agriculture Development Officer, Patiala inspected the shop of petitioner No.1 on 31st May, 2003 and found 90 litres of Butachlor 50% EC of one litre packing and 50 litres of Endosulfan 35% EC of 5 litres packing and drew the samples of Butachlor 50% and Endosulfan 35% out of the original packing which was manufactured by M/s Chemical Corporation of India, Delhi. After drawing the samples, one part thereof was given to the petitioner and two parts were retained by the Inspector. The sample, which was retained by the Inspector was sent to the Senior Analyst, Insecticide Testing Laboratory, Ludhiana where the same was found to be misbranded. On the basis of the report received, the instant comp
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top