SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 218

ALOK SINGH
Narinderpal Singh @ Ninda – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG Punjab

JUDGMENT

ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL)

1. This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in a case FIR No. 158 dated 25.9.2010 under Sections 323, 324, 326, 307, 452, 148, 149 IPC registered at Police Station Sultanpur Lodhi, District Kapurthala.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that neither in FIR nor in the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. it has been mentioned that petitioner-accused has caused any grievous injury with intention to kill the injured. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further argued that to constitute an offence under Section 307 IPC mens rea i.e. intention to kill is to be seen. Learned counsel has further argued that Section 307 IPC should not be attracted simply because injuries are found to be grievous in nature in the absence of any intention to kill. Learned counsel has further argued that although it is still debatable as to whether petitioner has ever caused any injury. However, since challan has been submitted against the petitioner, therefore, there is no likelihood of tempering with the evidence.

3. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG Punjab on the instructions of HC Manjit Singh opposed the bail application





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top