SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 619

NAWAB SINGH
Kavita – Appellant
Versus
State of Hayrana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ms. Deepa Singh, Amicus Curiae, for the petitioner.
Mr. Satyavir Yadav, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

JUDGMENT

NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL)

1. Ms. Deepa Singh, Advocate, who is present in Court, is appointed Amicus Curiae.

2. This revision has been filed by prosecutrix challenging the judgment dated July 15th, 2003 passed by Additional Sessions Judge Ad-hoc, Jhajjar, whereby, respondents No.2 and 3 were acquitted in case bearing First Information Report No. 36 dated February 8th, 2002 under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sadar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar.

3. Facts. On January 28th, 2002, prosecutrix (PW-10), aged about 18 years, met Jai Parkash in the Bazar in Jhajjar. She was student of 12th class. Jai Parkash told her that she was being called by her brother Jagbir. She accompanied him. At a little distance, a car was parked. He pushed her inside the car. She became unconscious. He threatened her with dire consequences if she raised alarm. Jai Parkash's brother Jitender alias Manju also reached there. She was administered two tablets by Jitender. She again became unconscious. She was kept in a room in jungle where besides Jitender, 2/3 other persons were present. Jai Parkash left the spot. She was kept in that room upto February 8th, 2002, that is, f







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top